The cameras weren’t so good in the 60s compared to today’s camera used for film but that old camera gave a certain effect in which you feel as if you’re in Verona at that time. The camera has a huge effect on the film. None of that was felt in the party scene for the 2013 version. 2013 version didn’t have a classic feeling, I believe it was due to it’s scene time.ġ968, at the party the song “What is a Youth” gave the movie viewers a feeling of love and it gave me goosebumps. With taking good time the movie felt legit, there was more of a classic feeling. The difference is huge! The party itself took time with the dance, romeo laying his eyes upon Juliet, and their kissing scene. Like the scenes of the party and most famous, the balcony. Meanwhile the 1968 went through every scene at a good pace. Now I decided to leave out the 1996 version because it’s a modern day setting but it will come in handy for a comparison later on.Ĭarlie’s version of Romeo and Juliet was rushed! Everything passed by so quickly. Both 19 are based in Verona during the renaissance era. I analyzed both movies and made a movie compare and contrast points. While watching the latest version I thought a lot about the 1968 version which is similar to the 2013 film, the 2013 film is a remake of the 1968 version, directed by Franco Zeffirelli. I’m a fan of the play and of the movies as well. Last night I watched Romeo and Juliet (2013 film) directed by Carlo Carlei.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |